exploring success of the nighttime city

Safety, proximity and interaction: the stuff of poetry, metrics or both?

If “cities, like cats, will reveal themselves at night,” as the English poet Rupert Brooke suggests, then how many of us should fear for our safety in the urban darkness? Is a nighttime city better measured by the numbers, rather than by such human perception and poetry?

In my view, first noted here. Brooke’s poetry is a worthy start. His feline analogy creates the framework for five important qualities of 24-hour, magnetic places. The first, safety, spurs four more—mobility, proximity, commerce and interaction.

An ideal night street dining scene would increase city rank

We know the positives from these qualities: legendary, all-night coding jags in the technology sector, vibrant nightlife and night markets, to name a few. All can enable more robust evening public transit service and police presence through a credible political voice lobbying for still more.

While metrics may not be necessary to frame the look and feel of a successful city at night, more formal measures might further structure inspirational images of vibrance over emptiness.

Perhaps it is time for a moniker—-a “lumens score” or “urban illumination index”—to add to the indicators of a 24-hour city, something characteristic of the creative metropolitan meccas called for by the vanguard of today’s urbanist advocates.

I can see the maps, graphs and charts, not to mention the list: “Top Ten Cities to Achieve Brilliance Without Light”.

The relationship between darkness and urbanism has been studied several times in interdisciplinary fashion, and at least one MIT course has been devoted to the “interaction design” of the associated “world of night”. However, my sense is that these efforts remain far more at the cutting edge than they should.

Low interactivity, an incomplete street: a low "lumens score"

In discussion of public safety issues concerning urban areas, law enforcement, design and planning often remain in their respective silos, devoid of integration.

Ongoing neighborhood policing and social service initiatives should be more outrightly integrated with the renewed focus on environmental and urban design criteria for safe streetscapes.

Concepts of “Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design” (CPTED)—frequently international in nature—have been present for decades and were implied in Jane Jacobs’ work.

CPTED principles on display in Melbourne

A recent visit to Melbourne, Australia, showed certain CPTED principles along neighborhood streetcar lines, including ample (glare-protective) night-lighting, territorial sensitivities to illuminated, sidewalk-oriented window areas, enhancement of the role of passing vehicles, transparent protection from weather at building entries, and low bushes and/or lower picket-type fencing along the street to limit access while allowing for entry visibility.

Similar safety-enhancement approaches to safety of female transit users have received wide attention. Many cities and civic associations (such as the Downtown Seattle Association) have also advocated for integration of CPTED principles.

Increased advocacy efforts for funding of pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure will accelerate policy and regulation encouraging such principles for safety. This should lead to further discussion opportunities for “complete streets,” which include the dimension of lighting to facilitate wider, multimodal use over a longer percentage of the day.

From the street, hidden possibilities intrigue the imagination amid open and closed businesses, shadows and light.

When evening light and crowds merge to create a sense of safety, where walking and transit define mobility and proximity, if commerce goes on without the sun, then human interaction with the built environment is a demonstrated success.

If we need to energize this after-dark integration by goal setting, for a “lumens score” of 10 out of 10, time is of the essence.

All images composed by the author. Click on each image for more detail.

39 thoughts on “exploring success of the nighttime city

  1. Pingback: George Osner, AICP

  2. Pingback: Jaime Jennings

  3. Pingback: drcreative re

  4. Pingback: Jon Commers

  5. Pingback: California Downtown

  6. Pingback: larissa

  7. Pingback: Mike Thomas

  8. Pingback: Brandon J. Huffman

  9. Pingback: Arno Neumann

  10. Pingback: Arno Neumann

  11. Pingback: Simone Pekelsma

  12. Pingback: The Atlantic Cities

  13. Pingback: arquiRED Mexico

  14. Pingback: Michael Martin

  15. Pingback: Andrea Learned

  16. Pingback: Andrea Learned

  17. Pingback: Shannon

  18. Pingback: Richard Florida

  19. Pingback: Joëlle Payet

  20. Pingback: Govind Nair

  21. Pingback: Robo Richard Florida

  22. Pingback: James Ribaudo

  23. Pingback: Rod Bovay

  24. Pingback: Galen Davis

  25. Pingback: Tedesa Johns

  26. Pingback: noelito

  27. Pingback: Andrew Knochel

  28. Chuck – great article. Your brainstorms on ‘“lumens score” or “urban illumination index”—to add to the indicators of a 24-hour city’ are good ideas – we should talk about what the rating factors would be. It is very nuanced, and the lighting design world has its own controversies!

    Please note my debate with Dark Skies “A thousand points on light”, Design Observer: http://lenischwendinger.wordpress.com/2009/08/28/design-observerchange-observer-debate-a-thousand-points-on-light/

    Also, “NightSeeing, Navigating Your Luminous City” is a program for planners to initiate awareness of light at night. http://www.nightseeing.net/

    Finally for your reference, I taught a multi-disciplinary course, “Designing Urban Nighttime Environments” at Parsons for several years.

    Perhaps the real problem is that lighting is not taken seriously enough (like architecture and planning) – let’s remedy!

    Leni Schwendinger

  29. Hi Leni and thanks for your references. I knew that someone with your experience would be way ahead on this. I’m of course just probing possibilities here. Glad to chat–we should.

  30. Pingback: Leni Schwendinger

  31. Pingback: The Philips Center

  32. Pingback: Bernardo Farill

  33. Pingback: Circula México

  34. Pingback: fluctuatingcity

  35. Pingback: fluctuatingcity

  36. Pingback: Harold Madi

  37. Pingback: Harold Madi

  38. Pingback: Bob Voelker

  39. Pingback: Estefania Vbs

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.