simple urban amenities at the public edge: a comparison

Posted by – October 19, 2010

An eclectic Provence window below introduces a back and forth conversation between American facades (to the left) and their counterparts (to the right), contrasting often uneventful stylistic reserve and usually empty balconies with traditions of rich color and plantings, angular perspectives and private spaces speaking outward to the street.

What if American cities legislated brighter color amid windows, balconies planted green and encouraged flags and hanging laundry? What if homeowner associations and rental contracts required vegetation and decoration of the interface with the street below?

For all of today’s urbanist dialogue about density, transit and proximity of home and work, an enhanced urban look and feel can also derive from practicing simple traditions of visual diversity.


17 Comments on simple urban amenities at the public edge: a comparison

  1. simple urban amenities at the public edge: a comparison: An eclectic Provence window below introduces a back and f… http://bit.ly/cbeOIz

  2. Dustin Urban says:

    RT @gosner: myurbanist #photoessay contrasts European & US public facades of pvt bldgs – http://j.mp/b95fuD

  3. Great post. I think such personalized public displays could help generate interest in urbanism. One of the major detractions from such movements is the perception of a loss of individual expression that stems from the rather corporate appearance of urban space. Allowing people the opportunity to add a certain vivid texture to urban space would certainly increase the appeal and would also create an opportunity for people to socialize.

  4. Should we include a type of personalized visual diversity as part of urbanism? http://bit.ly/cfVIl0

  5. dwayne_king says:

    simple urban amenities at the public edge: a comparison http://j.mp/bPTPeL

  6. RT @crwolfelaw: myurbanist revisited: simple urban amenities at the public edge: a comparison http://is.gd/gP6QI #urbanism #cities #sust …

  7. RT @crwolfelaw: myurbanist revisited: simple urban amenities at the public edge: a comparison http://is.gd/gP6QI #urbanism #cities #sust …

  8. Anton Peters says:

    RT @crwolfelaw: myurbanist revisited: simple urban amenities at the public edge: a comparison http://is.gd/h9ViM #urbanism #cities #sust …

  9. RT @LocalPlan: Should we include a type of personalized visual diversity as part of urbanism? http://bit.ly/cfVIl0

  10. Jinhee Kim says:

    RT @LocalPlan: Should we include a type of personalized visual diversity as part of urbanism? http://bit.ly/cfVIl0

  11. Josh Martin says:

    RT @crwolfelaw: myurbanist revisited: simple urban amenities at the public edge: a comparison http://is.gd/kBTBxA #urbanism #cities #sus …

  12. RT @crwolfelaw: myurbanist revisited: simple urban amenities at the public edge: a comparison http://is.gd/kBTBxA #urbanism #cities #sus …

  13. Lis Duarte says:

    RT @crwolfelaw: myurbanist revisited: simple urban amenities at the public edge: a comparison http://is.gd/Wibt4c #urbanism #cities

  14. RT @lisduarte: RT @crwolfelaw: myurbanist revisited: simple urban amenities at the public edge: a comparison http://is.gd/Wibt4c #urbanism

  15. Mark Bradley says:

    RT @crwolfelaw: myurbanist revisited: simple urban amenities at the public edge: a comparison http://is.gd/Wibt4c #urbanism #cities #sus …

  16. Simple urban amenities at the public edge – a comparison: http://bit.ly/j7Vb9j

  17. RT @viaarchitecture: Simple urban amenities at the public edge – a comparison: http://bit.ly/j7Vb9j

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Anti-Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree